What does the case study in the second question involve?

The second question presents a factual scenario of an assault, FIR lodging, investigation, and charges framed under IPC sections like 452, 324, 504, 506, 34.

What legal principles are tested in this paper?

The paper tests understanding of criminal procedure, evidence law, and their application in practical legal scenarios, including drafting and analysis.

What is the significance of quoting specific provisions of law?

Quoting specific provisions of law demonstrates a thorough understanding of the statutes and is crucial for a well-reasoned legal answer.

What is the role of the JMFC/Metropolitan Magistrate mentioned in Question 1?

The JMFC/Metropolitan Magistrate is a judicial officer who delivers judgments, and the question pertains to the appellate or revisional jurisdiction over such judgments.

What sections of the IPC are mentioned in the second question's case study?

The sections mentioned are 452 (House-trespass with preparation to commit offence punishable with imprisonment), 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 504 (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), 506 (Punishment for criminal intimidation), and 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention).

MPSC Assistant Public Prosecutor Paper-I 2012: Criminal Procedure Code & Evidence Act

Name: MPSC Assistant Public Prosecutor Paper-I 2012: Criminal Procedure Code & Evidence Act
Creator: Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC)
Keywords: MPSC Assistant Public Prosecutor, Assistant Public Prosecutor Exam Paper, Criminal Procedure Code 1973, Indian Evidence Act 1872, MPSC APP Paper-I, 2012 MPSC Exam, Law Screening Test, APP Syllabus, CrPC Questions, Evidence Act Questions, Legal Drafting Practice, Appellate Jurisdiction, Revisional Jurisdiction, Indian Penal Code Sections, Criminal Law Exam

Maharashtra Government Jobs Other Jobs 2012

Year 2012
Conducted By Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC)
Questions 1
Maximum Marks 100
Duration 3 Hours
Languages English

Exam Details

Detail	Information
Examination	Assistant Public Prosecutor, Group-A Screening Test
Year	2012
Conducting Body	Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC)
Paper	Paper-I
Subject	Criminal Procedure Code 1973, Indian Evidence Act 1872
Duration	3 Hours
Maximum Marks	100
Number of Questions	1
Question Type	Descriptive / Subjective

This is the Paper-I of the Assistant Public Prosecutor, Group-A Screening Test conducted by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) in 2012. The paper focuses on key legal statutes: the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It is a descriptive paper with a time limit of 3 hours and a maximum of 100 marks. Question 1 is worth 20 marks, while the remaining questions carry 16 marks each. Candidates are instructed to be concise, quote specific legal provisions, and avoid reproducing questions or revealing their identity in the answer book. The paper includes a case study scenario for one of the questions, requiring candidates to draft an appeal or revision and address legal aspects like limitation. The second question presents a detailed factual matrix involving an assault, FIR lodging, investigation steps, and charges framed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, requiring a comprehensive legal analysis. This paper is crucial for aspirants preparing for the MPSC APP examination, testing their understanding of procedural and evidence law in practical scenarios.

Major Topics Covered

Criminal Procedure Code 1973
Indian Evidence Act 1872
Assistant Public Prosecutor Exam
MPSC Exams
Law Screening Tests
Appeals and Revisions
Limitation Act
Jurisdiction of Courts
Indian Penal Code 1860
Criminal Law
Procedural Law
Evidence Law
Case Study Analysis
Legal Drafting
Criminal Investigation
FIR
Chargesheet
Medical Examination Reports
Witness Statements
Court Procedures

Why This Paper is Important

Useful for Assistant Public Prosecutor, Group-A Scr preparation
Helps understand the latest exam pattern
Useful for practice and self-assessment
Covers frequently asked General Studies topics
Helpful for analysing question trends

Related Resources

Instructions

सहायक सरकारी आर्थियोकता 52. चाइणी परीक्षा. 2092 3378 परीक्षा दि. 20 में, 2092 NRM 2012 Paper - I CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973, INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT 1872 Time: 3 Hours Maximum Marks: 100।
Note: All questions are compulsory.
(ii) Question No. 1 carries 20 marks. All other questions carry equal marks i. e. 16 marks each. .
(iii) Your answers must be to the point and wherever possible quoting the specific provisions of law.
(iv) Do not reproduce any question.
Write only question number against the answer. "Other than cited cases, candidate should not write roll number, any
(v) names (including one's own), signature, address or any indication of \breve{\mathbf{E}} one's identity anywhere inside the answer book, otherwise one will be penalized."
(vi) Marks to each question are indicated by figure in the margin on the right hand.
Draft Appeal/Revision out of judgement of JMFC/Metropolitan

Questions (page 2)

Q1. Draft Appeal/Revision out of judgement of JMFC/Metropolitan Magistrate. Mention the court in which appeal is to be preferred and how it is in limitation.
20

Q2. Facts of the case The accused 'A' and 'B', and injured are residents of the same village. They are residing adjacent to each other. There was a civil suit regarding land between them on the day of the incident i.e.
25-11-09. The injured, his wife and one minor son were in the house. At about 8.30 P.M. while they were taking food, the accused 'A' and 'B', came in front of his house and started saying why he filed civil suit against them. Saying this they both entered the house of the P.T.O.
(2) injured. Accused 'A', was having an axe in his hand. They abused the injured and rushed on his person. The accused 'A', inflicted axe blow on the left leg of injured and accused 'B', threw chilly powder on the face of the injured. They both accused and abused the injured and his family members. While the incident was going on, two persons from the neighbourhood came on the spot on hearing the cry of the injured. Those two persons and wife of the injured rescued the injured from the accused. The accused while going gave threat to the injured and his wife. There was light at that time. The injured sustained incised bleeding injury, due to which his cloth (pant) was stained with blood. There was blood spot in the house of the injured. As it was night time and as the police station was 20 km away and as there was no vehicle facility, the injured went to the police station alongwith his wife by bus next day, at about 9.30 A.M. and lodged the report mentioning all the facts. On the basis of the FIR the case was registered for offence u/s 452, 324, 504, 506, 34 of IPC against the accused. The complainant was referred to Govt. hospital. The Doctor issued medical certificate mentioning one incised wound on the left leg. The injury was having blood clot. The I.O. prepared spot punchanama, seized blood stained cloth, recorded the statements of wife, son of the complainant and also those persons who rescued the quarrel. These statements were recorded immediately. As the accused were not found in the village, they were arrested two days after the incident. The accused 'A', made Memorandum Statement and produced the axe which was blood stained. The said axe was attached under punchanama from the field of accused concealed in the bush. After receiving C.A. report, medical certificate and on completion of the investigation, chargesheet was submitted in the court. The JMFC framed the charge against the accused for offence u/s 452, 324, 504, 506, r/w 34 of IPC. The accused denied the same. The defence of the O(Rⁿ)

Question paper preview

Scanned pages 1–2 for reference. Download the official PDF for the full paper.

MPSC Assistant Public Prosecutor Paper-I 2012: Criminal Procedure Code & Evidence Act — page 1 instructions scan PDF download — Page 1

Free question paper download

Download question paper PDF

1.6 MB
4 pages
PDF format

Frequently asked questions

What is the exam name and year?

The exam is the Assistant Public Prosecutor, Group-A Screening Test, conducted in 2012.

Which subjects are covered in Paper-I?

Paper-I covers the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

What is the duration and maximum marks for the exam?

The duration is 3 Hours, and the maximum marks are 100.

What is the marking scheme for the questions?

Question No. 1 carries 20 marks, and all other questions carry equal marks of 16 marks each.

What are the key instructions for candidates?

Candidates must be to the point, quote specific legal provisions, not reproduce questions, and not reveal their identity in the answer book.

What is the first question about?

The first question requires drafting an Appeal/Revision out of a judgment of JMFC/Metropolitan Magistrate, mentioning the court and limitation.

← Back to Other Jobs papers